How language originated and its origin - strange theories

How language originated and its origin - strange theories

    “Words, with all the power of abuse and seduction, are the fastest things to go away. They're just a little more air. They come out of the body as a series of jets and slowly dissipate in the ocean. They fade great as if they weren't. To people begging to escape a great danger, but we got a variety of different languages ​​in which our ancestors communicated, and were a major reason why we were not extinct today.

More than 6900 languages ​​exist in the world today, carrying many of the words that exceeded the goal of communication to much deeper goals, have you ever thought how these words originated and how diversified? And the origin of its emergence and why it originated?

How language originated and its origin - strange theories

In the late 19th century, the Royal Linguistic Society banned conferences and debates on the origins of languages ​​on the pretext that the debate on this matter became sterile and based on hypotheses that lacked foundations and evidence that could be considered scientifically proven. Comedian Lily Tomlin recently proposed a cynical new hypothesis that men invented the language to find more space to complain about.
"One of the most difficult tasks in modern science is to research the emergence of languages," says Christine Kenneally, a writer in the field of language science. Does this mean that man has gone too far or too complex in this area?
In this report we show you some theories that suggest explanations for the origin of languages, some when you look at it may shake your head agree and say that it makes sense somewhat, and some may vacate a little bit of strangeness, and all gathered strange names have been developed for theories as a facilitator for students.
Perhaps those theories will make you smile and say: Why did not teach us these interesting theories in language lessons?
Bao F theory .. Simulating the sounds of nature
It was also called the cuckoo theory, attributed by Max Müller to the German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder, who assumed that speech was a tradition of animal and bird sounds. This theory is the origin of all languages, but through the attempt to imitate the voices heard, and then generated languages ​​thereafter.
This theory has its backing: the bird named in English as “cuckoo” is called the sound it makes, and the puss is called “mo” in ancient Egyptian, and in Chinese, relative to the sound it speaks.
Some modern linguists argue that this theory is the lowest and most plausible theory of health, while this theory has been criticized on the one hand that it fails to explain to us how the tale of sound was exploited in thousands of words whose meaning and voice we now see no relation to; What is the relationship between the word (pitcher) and its meaning? What is the relationship between the word (table) and its meaning? What is the relationship between the word (book) and its meaning? There is no apparent relationship.
Researchers who deny it show that the words that speak their voices have little meaning in the language, as Danish linguist Otto Jeppersen said: "The connection between the word and the meaning of the word is close, but we have to be careful not to overstate it."
"It is foolish to judge that there is a necessary relationship between voices and their meanings," said Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. "Words that speak their meaning are so few in languages ​​and so different that they cannot be the basis for a steady linguistic phenomenon. They are just a few words." He coincided with the sound of her voices. ”
Some threw this theory vile, he said about it «it stands by human thought at the borders of the cows and animals, and make the language of human high-end something limited to innate voices», and tried to refute Dossosir, he said «If this relationship is normal, and every word expresses its meaning, It is inspired by simulation, there would have been one language, not different languages;
Emotional Sounds
This theory says that "language emerged from the cries of pain, panic, fatigue, pleasure and the like, ie, spontaneous emotional sounds." In Arabic, there are many examples of this type: Taoah from Ah, and compassion of Auf.
But if this theory can explain the existence of some words in the language, it is unable to explain the thousands of words included in the language.
It is said that the first to suggest this theory was the philosopher Democritus, and called it the theory of exclamations, but the one who proposed the name Bo Bo theory was linguistic «Otto Gespersen», and symbolized the sound of crying and complaining in English.
One criticism of the theory that many animals make similar sounds, and did not evolve their language with time, is another matter that there are languages ​​almost devoid of emotional voices, how it grew and evolved and become what they are now ?!
Deng Dong Theory
"The meaning of the word derives from the meanings of its letters," said Max Müller, who called for children to be observed in their free daily lives, which indicate that they are eager to put names for things they see and do not know names for, and that they create names they have not heard. To satisfy their innate desire to speak and express their purposes, he deduced from his observation that man is equipped with that power, from which the words arose.
Accordingly, according to this theory, we can say: The origin of language is that man is equipped with the ability to formulate words, and this ability does not appear only when needed, and this theory was known to the Arabs and referred to: Ibn Jnei noted that (fulfillment) for example Weaknesses, and noted the differences between the voices, and in the late ages, the linguist writer Abdullah al-Alaili made a list in terms of letters.
The theory confirms that the word bell denotes its meaning.For example, saying “tug of war”, the Shin, including outbreaks, sound similar to the first attraction of the rope before the tightening of the contract, and then followed by the tightness and pull is expressed by the sign, which is stronger than the Shin, especially when they are dungeon.
This theory was rejected by many linguists, considering that the words that can be interpreted on this principle are very few, if the letter guinea denotes darkness, applicability, concealment and sadness as some of them went citing (cloud, cloud, Gabin) how to explain my words: rich The euphoria?
U Theory is Yo .. The voice response to muscle movement
This theory assumed that the emergence of the language first that emerged was accompanied by the collaborative work between members of the same group, so that they produce a set of overlapping rhythmic sounds, in accordance with the muscular effort that produces sounds, such as repeated sighing and voices issued by the old man when doing hard work such as breaking stone Or rowing boats or carrying weights.
Plato also believed that language arose for a purely practical need, and modern neuroscience proved that the consistency of right-hand action and speech is controlled from the same area in the left part of the brain; does this mean that there is potential evidence that manual skill and the need for verbal communication developed harmoniously in The human brain?
Some linguists argue that this scenario may illustrate the beginning of the genesis of poetry and rhyme;
Another weakness in this theory is how these rhythmic voices are related to meaning? How did it develop from mere rhythmic sounds to vocabulary in the sense?
Ta ta theory .. signals accompanied by voices
The author of this theory is Richard Paget in 1930, and summarized that the human language began with the natural vocal segments spoken by man spontaneously in line with his signals when he uses the organs of his body to communicate, the old man was understanding the signals originally, that is, moving the hand, or the expression of the face, and these movements It is usually accompanied by certain spontaneous sounds. In the daytime, the old man used both together (signal and sound), and if he reaps the night depends on the sounds only.
Charles Darwin supported this theory and supported the results of neuroscientist Ramachandran Vilayanur S. Ramachandran's compatibility between the sensory-motor side and sounds.
But the question is that it provides a sophisticated repertoire of gestures and signals that are imitated by sound, but does not explain why these gestures originated and how.
The theory of la la .. Language originated because of love!
"There is no doubt that our male or female ancestors sought to fascinate and attract each other with rhythmic musical sounds and rhythms, before they gained the power to express love in words," says Charles Darwin, the theory that language arose from the development of sounds related to love, play and poetry. And sensual songs. “I almost imagine that language is the first thing,” says Otto Gaspersen
I grew up, I grew up in an intimate time, a human courtship where the first words grew up in rhythms resembling the sound of a nightingale. ''
It is taken from this theory, in the eyes of some, that it is too poetic theory. Critique of the theory David Crystal pointed out in his book «How language works» that the gap of this hypothesis is the gap between the emotional and mental aspects of expression in the language, if language arises In emotional expression, how has it evolved in the mental side?
Theory «See sparrow»
Also called the theory of «lying», named after See Asfour as a term refers to the deception, was used in the days of the beginning of photography, especially when filming children, the photographer says to the child see Asfour, raising the child's head in a suitable position to take a picture.
Sturtivant suggests that since true intentions and feelings are expressed involuntarily by gestures and body language, a voluntary communication tool controlled by the person may be developed and may be used to lie and deceit.Stortevant also noted that deceptive social motivation created the language, which explains why human communication seems For example, a bee does not lie to the rest of the bee about where the nectar is, and then laughs at them when it is revealed.
Gossip and grooming theory
Gossip, according to Robin Dunbar, is based on the lives of a group of human beings, as well as other primitives. So the task of showing compassion and caring about shoulder-blowing or touching every person's friends and acquaintances is taking a long time, and because this solution is not available to address this problem; from Dunbar's perspective, man has devised a cheaper and more efficient way of communicating: voice communication.
To keep your allies happy you just need to console them and show sympathy for them through low-cost voices, serving several allies at the same time and keeping both hands full-time for other tasks. Then that voice communication gradually evolved into spoken language - initially in the form of chatter, so Dunbar sees the origins of language.
Critics of this theory point out that the ability and efficiency of voice communication is referred to by the fact that words are very cheap, which may undermine and reduce the value and ability of words versus concrete communication consuming high-cost time.
Another criticism suggests that the theory has done nothing to explain the fateful shift from emotional communication with sounds - producing meaningless voices to bring joy and pleasure - to the cognitive complexities of grammar and speech.
Theory of laying the baby to the ground
Dean Falk's child-to-land theory refers to the vocal interactions between our maternal ancestors with their infants that ultimately led to the emergence of language.
The idea of ​​this basic hypothesis is that the mothers were making reassuring voices while they were far from them and could not communicate with them in a tangible way such as tickling, patting, laughter and other physical ways of communication;
In his book "The Mental and Social Life of Infants," psychologist Kenneth Kaye argues that "no adult language can be used without interactive communication between infants and adults." He adds that no symbolic language system can survive from generation to generation if the child does not acquire it. In normal social life conditions.
William Tecumseh Fitch suggested that the Darwinian principle of choosing a relative - the convergence of genetic interests among relatives - may be part of the answer. It is also suggested that all languages ​​were essentially a mother tongue;
Critics point to this theory that the choice of relative is not unique to humans; for example, monkey mothers share genes with their offspring, as well as all animals, so why is man the only being able to speak?
Hawks Box Theory .. Religion and magic are the origin of language!
The theory suggests that the roots of language have a magical spiritual religious dimension, perhaps through which the voices of our ancestors began during their religious rituals and then evolved into a medium of communication, such as issuing a magical voice for their cattle and then become the name they call them and so on.
Theory «I found it»
This theory suggests that language emerged consciously and intentionally, one of them invented so that each voice was linked to a particular thing and a certain concept becomes expressed, then expanded the matter among all humanity, and adopted as a way of communication between humans.
Poisoned mushrooms are the reason why language appears
This theory explains that the beginning of speech was due to delirium caused by eating poisoned mushrooms, and the theory suggests that with the occurrence of drought in Africa and the emergence of the savannah plains forced the first human to move to search for new sources of nutrition, including poisoned mushrooms that cause symptoms, one of them delirium, and eating this Mushrooms on a regular basis, and the repeated occurrence of this delirium, according to this theory has stimulated the sounds that ultimately led to the voice communication.